Learning.

Our group has decided to turn the cafe of The Collection into an Exhibition.
We first tired out to make small plaques like in an art gallery.

IMG_1571
IMG_1570
IMG_1569
IMG_1566

Though once in place we noticed that they were far too small, and though we were planning for subtle, it was far too subtle, so we have now decided for big letters, made out of plastic.

We then noticed the cafe was a far too small place for now a much bigger performance, so we have now moved the “exhibition” outside the cafe, though we are still mirroring the cafe, and having our text come from the conversations we heard in the cafe.

Learning but doing is a valuable form.

Our performance now reminds me of this video

(Homotopiafestival, 2007)

Like him with his salon, we are now mirroring the cafe culture but in a more exaggerated way. This similarities do not stop there, like him we are performing with text from actual customers.

As we start anew we are unsure where our near ideas will lead us, though I believe being more bigger with our acting and plagues will hopefully become an effective piece for people to understand that we are mirroring the cafe.

Bibliography:

Homotopiafestival, (2007) Salon Adrienne. available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmUn2ZTzeY0 [accessed 16/04/13]

Masking Reality

Our piece has developed so much since our initial idea as we wanted to use drama masks, such as the white masks, however we have discussed and developed this idea into something a little more subtle getting the members of the public to interpretate what they see, which is very much similar to what the public do when they are in the usher gallery. Which makes our performance an exhibition. Our stimuli is still the same, which is masking. Masking reality. For instance the painting which was in the Usher gallery  by John Carmichael. Due to this painting being a masked painting of Lincoln at the time, it is also stated in the text next to the painting that it is an idealized viewing of the Bradford.

Why are things masked? Why is reality changed? What is the point of this?

‘ The masking disclosure replaces the reality, as it is more compelling than reality ‘  Sjoberg, Laura (1979) Gender, Justice, And wars in Iraq: A feminist reformulation of just war theory’ it states  (ed) A Reconstructive Project for Feminist Just War Theory, Little field Publishers, Pg 209.  I agree with quote from this book, as it does idealize a product making something better than what it actually is. Whether that is a painting or a person. This in our piece is very something that we are wanting to portray, using make-up as the mask identifying the social factors in today’s society.  The idea of masking replacing reality, reflects a dishonest portrait. Features are highlighted in a positive manner by using masking . Paintings in the usher gallery for me seem to reflect the idealistic themes that run through the room.  The quote used above states that masking is more compelling than reality which in some cases are true. However in other cases or other themes reality can be a beneficial to the project creating a hard hitting message.

By using make-up in our piece both applying ( masking) and removing it (naturalistic) it forms a balanced message for our audience, showing the filtered version of ourselves the removing the making up showing the no filter and honest image of ourselves. which does allow the audience to have their own interpretation of our work, making them ask particular questions about what we are doing, whether we as a society are being masked to believe what is right what is wrong? what is beauty what is not? This links to Carmichael’s painting of masking, as his idealized picture of the Brayford connects with our interpretation of idealizing our faces by using make-up to create and look different that highlights the image which we want to look like.

 

 

The Pleasure of Treasure

With our sculpture continuing to be built, I thought I’d take some time to consider other parts of the performance. I was interested to read an article recently on the Pleasure of Treasure, a site specific piece based in London which gave people the opportunity to follow clues on a city-wide scavenger hunt. Since the piece was based in London, it was thought-provoking to read and in fact has some similar elements to the performance piece we are now creating. The Artangel group, initiated by Kathy Battista, recreated maps from 1868 merged with contemporary maps for those taking part. Our initial idea bore some relevance to this, as we discussed the idea that previously where the Usher Gallery stood it was just woodland, and the bringing together of what used to stand and what now does stand in the space was considered. We also had a chance to look at some older maps of Lincoln in the Lincolnshire Archives, which may have added an interesting element, as we discussed covering Big Ben with maps of London or Lincoln. This idea has evolved and we are now looking at incorporating both the history of the site and modern elements.

Another part we found struck a chord with us was the final effect the Artangel group wanted to produce with the walk. As we want the audience to consider their personal attachments to a city, the group wanted people to question ‘what they thought they already knew about… inner-city London’ (Battista et al. 2005, p.431). This idea of wanting people to query where they live and what they know about their roots and the city they feel comfortable in is prevalent in both site specific pieces. Along with this we also wanted to consider the ‘overlapping histories that make up urban space’ (Battista et al. 2005, p.439), in accordance with both London and Lincoln, with the idea that we’d be able to overlap both cities to create our own version. I feel this is somewhat close to what we are working towards, two intersections of historical places overlapped in order to become our own personal culture.

Although not much is documented about this particular site specific performance, other pieces by the Artangel group can be found on their website at www.artangel.org.uk.

References: Battista, Kathy et al (2005) ‘Exploring ‘an area of unnatural beauty’: a treasure hunt around King’s Cross, London’, Cultural Geographies, 12: 429-462.

Author: Lacey Cole

 

“A twist of fate…”

Our group was left slightly perturbed after we discovered the recent rehanging of the collection meant that our focal painting of The Brayford had been removed. This was initially very worrying as we wondered as to whether our piece still had relevance and made sense in the space despite our original stimulus being missing. However, after this panic, we took the time to look at what had taken its place and to our relief realised the drawing hanging in its place had in fact a lot of relevance to our piece. It is a drawing of the statue, Venus de Milo. This sculpture depicts Venus, also known as Aphrodite, who is Greek Goddess of love, beauty, and fertility who also represents affection and the attraction that binds people together in marriage.

Instead of now removing our makeup in front of the painting of the Brayford, the image is that of beauty, meaning we could now be seen to be making a statement on what ‘true beauty’ really is. Considering the nature of our performance, it has allowed us and an audience to interpret our actions in a different way and by incorporating an event from the real world,

“In effect the work becomes not only the original concept or piece, but any significant public or official response to it, or any further variations which the work may take as a result of its engagement with the world at large.” (Burnham in Kaye, 2000, p194)

Here Burnham explain how by using an action which people are aware of and can relate to, like we use the application of makeup, it allows the audience to respond to it in another way which they see fit. Is it covering girls’ faces with makeup to fit with society’s vision of perfection, just like artists often mask or alter their art to please the public? Will our audience see the link between art and society masking itself to create unnatural perfection or even make a new connection of their own? Wearing makeup has become an accepted and often expected part of society for women. This natural need to wear makeup has become embedded into our daily routine, the need to put on a mask to please the people we will meet. “It was revealed that women wore significantly more makeup when they anticipated an interaction with a highly attractive target, irrespective of sex.” (Regan, 2011, p563). We will take a personal act usually done in the private of your own home and instead use it as a performative act.

Developing from this further is the visual image of a male drawing three females which is the main visual of our piece for the audience. This evokes ideas regarding the male gaze and the deeper reasoning behind females desire to cover and conceal their faces. We are currently experimenting into the different ways in which Tom can draw us and if his sketching should match our application of makeup, almost as if he is controlling our movements. We will experiment with the speed and accuracy of his drawings so the more erratic they become, the hastier and less accurate our makeup application will be. This will make a bold statement on the idea of the male gaze and hopefully make our audience question their reasoning behind their own daily beauty regime.

This change of stimulus has developed our ideas in ways we hadn’t first thought about but in turn gives our performance deeper social meanings and connections into how beauty is portrayed in art and in life.

 

Works Cited

Burnham in Kaye, Nick (2000) Site Specific Art: Performance, Place and documentation. London:Routledge

Regan, Pamela C. (2011) “CINDERELLA REVISITED: WOMEN’S APPEARANCE  MODIFICATION AS A FUNCTION OF TARGET AUDIENCE SEX AND ATTRACTIVENESS”, SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY. May: 563-576

S h o w c a s e feedback

Today we were able to show what we have decided to do for our performance.

It was a helpful session as we were able to get feedback from the rest of the group and insight in to what worked about our piece and what did not.

Good:

– It engaged the audience and made them think about their own meanings of the piece

– The simplicity is effective, less is more

^^this was something we were happy to hear as we had taken this from Site-Specific Art by Nick Kaye:

‘minimalism in site-specificity can be said to begin in sculpture, yet reveal itself in performance, a move which calls into question its formal as well as spatial location.’

– The words read over the performance add intrigue to the action

Concerns:

– The use of the pens on cardboard distracted from the words read due to noise

– the words written on the boxes were overly obvious ‘baby #2’ and ‘why is this happening?’

– The link between the film installation and out performance – was it too much?

We are going to look in to these feedback comments and work on our performance further.